by Steve C. Halbrook
posts in this series:
part 1: The Inoculation Controversy of the 1700s
part 2: Opposition to Vaccines by Doctors and Others in History
part 3: The Inquisition Against Opponents of Bad Medical Practices
part 4: The Medical Profession's Legacy of Tyranny, Torture, and Murder
part 2: Opposition to Vaccines by Doctors and Others in History
part 3: The Inquisition Against Opponents of Bad Medical Practices
part 4: The Medical Profession's Legacy of Tyranny, Torture, and Murder
part 6: Unsafe & Deceptive — the Polio Vaccine Scam
part 7: Moral Objections to Vaccination and Inoculation in History
part 8: Death Certificates and Hiding the Vaccine Holocaust
part 7: Moral Objections to Vaccination and Inoculation in History
part 8: Death Certificates and Hiding the Vaccine Holocaust
“The heart is deceitful above all things, And desperately wicked; Who can know it? (Jeremiah 17:9, NKJV)
"Indeed, it is a commonplace with medical men, that no child dies of Vaccination; and hence Vaccination is not an admitted cause of death; and when the fact is insisted upon, there is no limit to the hardihood wherewith the truth is crushed down and covered up."
— William White, The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-fact Chapters (London: E.W. Allen, 1885), 68.
Series Intro
Vaccines have become one of the most polarizing issues of the day. There is an aggressive push by lawmakers to force everyone to become vaccinated, as well as intense hostility by many vaccine supporters towards those who question the efficacy and safety of vaccines. Where's all the opposition to vaccines coming from? Are opponents of them crazed fanatics, looking for a conspiracy, or are their concerns legitimate? Having given this topic much reflection and research, we are of the view that they indeed have a case against vaccines, and that vaccines—far from being safe and effective—are a dangerous plague and one of the greatest deceptions in our day.
This series is a case against vaccines from both an historical and biblical perspective. Our hope is that it will equip Christians to better understand how dangerous vaccines really are, and to approach the situation from a biblical worldview.
In writing this series, we planned for a standalone blog post on the vaccine holocaust in history. However, as we began research for the post, we found that there was too much material alone on hiding vaccines as an official cause of death. Thus, we decided to make this topic a standalone post. (And, given the abundance of material on vaccine-caused deaths, we plan to do several topical posts on the vaccine holocaust in history.)
Now, throughout vaccine history, one way that the ongoing vaccine holocaust has been concealed is by obscuring — or outright changing — official causes of death. Doctors, of course, are notorious for dismissing the countless number of vaccine deaths as "coincidence" (as countless parents of vaccine-slain children will tell you); and, when it comes to official death reports (which this post is about), those involved (such as doctors and coroners)[1] are disinclined to ever consider vaccines as harmful.
Really, this is a problem with the whole system.
Note: footnotes are not included at the end of the entire article, but at the end of each section.
Note
_______________________________________________
[1] One may understand why doctors, being indoctrinated in medical school, would be this way, but why coroners?
First, they are subject to the same overall societal pressure of never challenging the vaccine idol (perceived public credibility is at stake). Second, they are in essence doctors, with the same allopathic "training."
Dr. Ferdinand Dupre writes in 1867, "I never heard of a single Homoeopathic doctor, for instance, becoming coroner. Allopathy 'rules the roast.'" (Ferdinand Dupre, Orthodox or Allopathic Medicine: what is it? (London: Simpkin, Marshall & Co., 1867), 108.)
Today, "Most areas will require that the coroner be a medical doctor. This means that someone seeking this position will need to go to medical school and become a licensed physician." (Legal Career Path, "Coroner Careers" (2018). Retrieved February 8, 2018, from http://legalcareerpath.com/coroner/.)
First, they are subject to the same overall societal pressure of never challenging the vaccine idol (perceived public credibility is at stake). Second, they are in essence doctors, with the same allopathic "training."
Dr. Ferdinand Dupre writes in 1867, "I never heard of a single Homoeopathic doctor, for instance, becoming coroner. Allopathy 'rules the roast.'" (Ferdinand Dupre, Orthodox or Allopathic Medicine: what is it? (London: Simpkin, Marshall & Co., 1867), 108.)
Today, "Most areas will require that the coroner be a medical doctor. This means that someone seeking this position will need to go to medical school and become a licensed physician." (Legal Career Path, "Coroner Careers" (2018). Retrieved February 8, 2018, from http://legalcareerpath.com/coroner/.)
Hiding vaccine-caused deaths to preserve vaccination from reproach in history
Death by vaccination is all too common — but not commonly officially reported. Vaccination as a cause of death is repeatedly buried to preserve vaccination from reproach. According to Eleanora I. McBean:
Vaccination, which is entirely lacking in value to the human race, has been sustained by falsity. Records of the enormous number of deaths from vaccination have either been completely concealed or twisted to appear favorable to the people. The medical records, unfortunately, have been in the hands of the doctors who profit from the sale of vaccines and drugs and who, (by their own admission,) are more interested in their own financial gains than in the well-being of the public.
Lawsuits and government investigations have been made from time to time, which brought some of the medical confessions into public view, just enough to show us that there is a great deal yet to be uncovered in this sordid game of murder for money.[1]J.T. Biggs (Sanitary Engineer and magistrate), in his 1912 work Sanitation versus Vaccination, considered the possibility of death certificates being manipulated to protect vaccination throughout England:
That practice of "preserving vaccination from reproach" is believed to be common, and if the suspicion be well founded, it shows how our national vital statistics are considerably vitiated and the public deceived.[2]Alfred Russel Wallace (1898) wrote the following on the suppression of vaccines as a cause of death from the outset of vaccine history:
That such suppressio veri is no new thing, but has been going on during the whole period of vaccination, is rendered probable by a statement in the Medical Observer of 1810, by Dr. Maclean. He says : "Very few deaths from cowpox appear in the Bills of Mortality, owing to the means which have been used to suppress a knowledge of them. Neither were deaths, diseases, and failures transmitted in great abundance from the country, not because they did not happen, but because some practitioners were interested in not seeing them, and others who did see them were afraid of announcing what they knew."[3]This topic of suppressing the truth about vaccines as a cause of death is not hard to grasp when we consider the finite, fallen nature of man coupled with ignorance, superstition, financial incentives, and the difficulties doctors naturally have in admitting to killing their patients. We now turn to some more concrete examples.
Notes
_______________________________________________
[2] J.T. Biggs J.P., Leicester: Sanitation versus Vaccination (WHALE 2006/7, 1912). Retrieved February 8, 2018, from http://www.whale.to/a/biggs.html.
[3] Alfred Russel Wallace, Vaccination a Delusion: Its Penal Enforcement a Crime: Proved by the Official Evidence in the Reports of the Royal Commission (London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., 1898), 18, 19.
Convenient causes of death
Over and over again, we find complaints throughout the history of vaccination of vaccines being overlooked (even intentionally) as causes of death. While in some cases it may be corrupt oversight or ignorance, it is reported so often that there really appears to be an idolatrous mindset to consciously protect vaccines from reproach.
William White, in his 1885 work The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-fact Chapters, writes about a one Aaron Emery who lost his child to vaccination. Emery was initially pro-vaccine before undergoing this horrific experience. White writes,
Up to the time of this fatality, Mr. Emery had been an unsuspicious believer in vaccination; but his sorrow led him to acquaintance with numerous cases like his own, screened from public recognition, any artifice being accounted laudable which seemed necessary to preserve vaccination from reproach.[1]What happened? Here's Emery's account:
Mr. Aaron Emery related in vigorous English how an infant of his had been vaccinated from a healthy-looking child on 31st May, 1869; how erysipelas followed; how it gradually got worse; how "the little fellow had no rest night nor day from 9th June to 4th July, when death put an end to his sufferings." Then he told the difficulty he had to obtain a true certificate of death from the vaccinator; how he forced an inquest; how a verdict was returned, "Died from erysipelas caused by vaccination"; and how its terms were subsequently altered by Coroner Lankester and registered as altered at Somerset House.[2]J.T. Biggs (Sanitary Engineer and magistrate), in his 1912 work Sanitation versus Vaccination, provides several examples of protecting vaccination from reproach as it relates to cause of death. One includes the following:
[T]here was the report, in 1876, to the Local Government Board by Mr. J. H. Radcliffe (one of the Board's Inspectors), on certain fatal cases of erysipelas in the Misterton District of the Gainsborough Union, Lincolnshire. That inquiry showed that erysipelas, admittedly caused by vaccination, had resulted there in at least six deaths — and probably more. In his report the Inspector referred to "the use of dirty lancets," or "dirty points," "erysipelatous or septic mischief," "glandular irritation," and to "a peculiar tenderly to the spread of erysipelas" existing in the district. ...
In passing, it is significant to note that this official inquiry elicited the fact that these six little victims of vaccination had all been buried under misleading death certificates, no word as to vaccination appearing on any of those documents.[3]Alfred Russel Wallace, in the 1898 work Vaccination a Delusion: Its Penal Enforcement a Crime: Proved by the Official Evidence in the Reports of the Royal Commission, writes the following about the phenomenon of overlooking vaccine-caused deaths in England:
As an example of the number of cases occurring all over the country, Mr. Charles Fox, a medical man residing at Cardiff, has published fifty-six cases of illness following vaccination, of which seventeen resulted in death. In only two of these, where he himself gave the certificate, was vaccination mentioned. All of these cases were examined by himself personally. Among those who survived, several were permanently injured in health, and some were crippled for life; while in most of the cases the inflammation and eruptions are so painful, and the sufferings of the children so great and so prolonged, that the mother endures continuous mental torture, lasting for weeks, months, or even years. And if one medical man can record such a mass of injury and disease in which vaccination was the palpable starting-point and certainly a contributory cause, what must be the total mass of unrecorded suffering throughout the whole country?[4]Wallace continues with sobering insights from a statistician and medical officer who formerly was a vaccinator:
Considering this and other evidence, together with the admitted and very natural concealment by the doctors concerned, "to save vaccination from reproach," the estimate of Mr. Alfred Milnes, a statistician who has paid special attention to the subject, that the officially admitted deaths must be at least multiplied by twelve to obtain the real deaths from vaccination, we shall arrive at the terrible number of over 600 children and adults killed annually by this compulsory operation; while judging from the proportion of permanent injury (twenty-eight) in Mr. Fox’s fifty-six cases and seventeen deaths, about 1,000 persons annually must suffer from it throughout their lives! As confirmatory of even this large amount, the testimony of Mr. Davidson, Medical Officer of Health for Congleton, and formerly a Public Vaccinator, is important. He began an inquiry into the alleged injurious effects of vaccination, without believing that they were serious. The outcome of his investigation was startling to him. In his Annual Report for 1893, he says: "In the investigation of a single vaccination period, the fact was revealed that in quite fifty per cent. of all vaccinated in that period (about seventy), the results were abnormal, and, in a large number of these very grave injuries had been inflicted. That the results of the practice are the same elsewhere as in Congleton I have no reason to doubt, for judging from what I have seen of his method of vaccinating, our Public Vaccinator is as careful as it seems possible for a Public Vaccinator to be."[5]A one Dr. Whitefoord, as reported to the The Vaccination Inquirer and Health Review in 1883, reports this tragic account of a child slain by vaccines:
I was called to see an infant on September 18, aged twelve weeks, the son of Mrs. Darling, of 222, Euston-road, who bad been vaccinated six days previously. The mother stated that she received two threatening notices to enforce the vaccination of her child, and, although delicate, the operation was performed. Subsequently the child refused food, wasted, and died on the seventeenth day. The vaccinated arm, well hacked in four places, wasted more than the other arm.
At the time of vaccination the mother was informed that the lymph from which her infant was vaccinated was only four times removed from the calf. This assurance, however, ill-compensated the mother for the loss of her child.[6]According to The Vaccination Inquirer and Health Review a, the coroner, against Dr. Whitefoord's wishes, refused to allow for an investigation that would connect the death with vaccination:
Dr. Whitefoord refused to certify the cause of the child's death without an inquest, holding that the death was due to acute meningitis caused by vaccination, performed at the Government Vaccine Station, Tottenham Court-road. The coroner, however, refused to hold an inquest, and the child was buried under what is called a "coroner's order" — a convenient way of shielding vaccination from reproach![7]
In the report of the Royal Commission (England) Vol. IV, pages 194 to 478, we find a number of cases of vaccinal deaths that were not reported as such. For example: Mr. Payne gave evidence that he had a child who died of vaccination. The doctor told him that he had not the slightest doubt that the illness was the result of vaccination, but that he dared not put it on the certificate of death.
In the same section we read: "Local Government Board inquiry into six deaths at Misterton, Linconshire, found all to have resulted from vaccination; and in all the cases, vaccination was not mentioned on the certificate of death. Local Government Board inquiry into four deaths from vaccination at Norwich, found that in three of these cases vaccination was not mentioned."[8]McBean also reports,
From the Royal Commission Report we read:
"Dr. Buchanan reported six deaths from smallpox, stating them to be unvaccinated. An inquiry was organized, under the orders of the Local Government Board and ... it was found that all had been vaccinated but one. One of the death cases had been vaccinated by Dr. Buchanan himself. Dr. Buchanan acknowledged his error and said that the cases were of confluent smallpox (so bad that the vessicles were run together) and he couldn’t see the vaccination marks." (Report of the Royal Commission, England, Vol. II, p.219.)[9]"Natural Causes" appears to have been a common way to conceal vaccine-caused deaths. Morris A. Bealle quotes the following in his 1949 book The Drug Story:
Dr. Herbert Snow, the senior surgeon of the Cancer Hospital in London said: "Of recent years many men and women in the prime of life have dropped dead suddenly, often after attending a wedding feast or banquet. I am convinced that some 80% of these deaths are caused by the inoculations or vaccinations they have undergone. These are well known to cause grave and permanent disease to the heart. The coroner always hushes it up with "Natural Causes".[10]
Notes
_______________________________________________
[1] William White, The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-fact Chapters (London: E.W. Allen, 1885), 555.
[2] Ibid.
[3] J.T. Biggs J.P., Leicester: Sanitation versus Vaccination (WHALE 2006/7, 1912). Retrieved February 8, 2018, from http://www.whale.to/a/biggs.html.
[4] Alfred Russel Wallace, Vaccination a Delusion: Its Penal Enforcement a Crime: Proved by the Official Evidence in the Reports of the Royal Commission (London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co., 1898), 19.
[5] Ibid., 19, 20.
[6] E.M.L, "Vaccination De Rigueur," in The Vaccination Inquirer and Health Review, Vol. V, no. 55 (October, 1883). In The Vaccination Inquirer and Health Review, Volume the Fifth, April, 1883, to March, 1884 (London: Edward W. Allen, 1884), 149. [7] Ibid.[8] Eleanora I. McBean, Swine Flu Expose (1977). Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://www.whale.to/vaccine/sf5.html#A DOCTOR%E2%80%99S.[9] Ibid.
[10] Morris A. Bealle, The Drug Story (Spanish Fork, UT: The Hornet's Nest, 1949, 1976). Retrieved December 25, 2018, from http://www.whale.to/a/beale.html.Admission by England's Royal Commission
The Final report of the Royal Commission appointed to inquire into the subject of vaccination, published in 1896, says the following about official causes of death post-vaccination:
The cases in which the death has been certified as connected with vaccination cannot all be regarded as cases in which there was the link of causation between them. Indeed, the medical men whose certificates associated the two did not always intend to indicate that the disease which ended in death had its origin in vaccination. There have, no doubt, been other cases in which, although the illness which ended fatally was engendered by vaccination, there has been no mention of it in the certificate of death. Whether these are sufficient in number to counterbalance, or more than counterbalance those in the other category, the evidence does not enable us to say.[1]It is interesting that the report refers to "medical men whose certificates associated the two did not always intend to indicate that the disease which ended in death had its origin in vaccination."
However, not intending to indicate that a disease "had its origin in vaccination" does not necessarily mean that such medical men had legitimate reasons to deny vaccines had a role with such deaths. As we have already seen (and as we will see further), there is an institutional bias in favor of vaccines that deeply colors the perception (and even honesty) of medical men.
Moreover, while the report is quick to deny that all deaths connected with vaccination can all "be regarded as cases in which there was the link of causation between them," considering that this report comes from those in a pro-vaccination system, the report surprisingly admits that some certificates of death erroneously failed to acknowledge vaccines as the cause of death:
There have, no doubt, been other cases in which, although the illness which ended fatally was engendered by vaccination, there has been no mention of it in the certificate of death.[2]Thus, while prior to stating this the report tries to give vaccines some cover, the Royal Commission nevertheless states in black and white a neglect of mentioning vaccines as a cause of death in death certificates.
Notes
_______________________________________________
[2] Ibid.
Embracing absurdity to protect the vaccine idol
As we will see below, there is no end to the absurdity that some will embrace in order to protect the vaccine idol. To reject the obvious, one must embrace the outlandish.
Eleanora I. McBean reports about a boy who was killed almost immediately after vaccination; and yet, the cause of death was not said to be vaccination — but shock!!!:
James Connor, age seven, of Evanston, Illinois, died three minutes after being given anti-scarlet fever serum. The doctor who killed the boy told the coroner’s jury that the serum couldn’t possibly have killed him. Therefore the jury officially decided the boy had died of shock. What shocked him — deadly poison injection?[1]
Willliam White discusses this insane trend of denying the obvious:
When the poor complain that their children are injured or slain by vaccination, they are officially informed they are mistaken. Dr. Stevens, a well-known familiar of the vaccination office, says he has seen more vaccination than any man, and has yet to witness the least injury from the practice. Variolators used to say the same of their practice until vaccinators arose and convicted them of lying. Coroner Lankester held that vaccination was not a cause of death "recognised by law," and was therefore an impossible cause. Such prevarication is mockery. True it is that, if a child dies of vaccination, it dies of erysipelas, or pyoemia, or diarrhoea, and it is easy enough to ignore the primary cause and assert the secondary; but I would ask, How else can death ensue from vaccination than by erysipelas, pyoemia, diarrhoea, or similar sequelae? If vaccination kills a child, how otherwise could it kill? Even should death occur directly from surgical shock, it would be said, the child did not die of vaccination, but from lack of vigour to sustain a trivial operation. The Sangrado of the Stevens pattern is never without a shuffle.[2]The following from a cross-examination as recorded in Appendix IX to the Final Report of the Royal Commission on Vaccination (1897) reflects the obvious protection given to vaccines in late-nineteenth century death certificates in Britain:
How does vaccination become a secondary cause and erysipelas the primary cause when the child was vaccinated a week at least before erysipelas appeared? — Because in giving a certificate of death we must give the approximate cause of death, which in this case was erysipelas. The other causes we must give afterwards.[3]Eleanora I. McBean says that a one Dr. John Tilden, in his Health Review, writes:
John Begasiren, a child of four years, helpless and taken by his father to the Bellview hospital for treatment for infantile paralysis, is dead. Unofficially his death is recorded as due to a ‘serum accident.’
The staff physician at the institution passed off the tragedy casually saying, ‘It wasn’t the serum that killed the boy; it was the child’s susceptibility that made him unable to stand the shock of the poison virus that was injected into his veins.’
Digest this gem of logic, if you can. Tap yourself over the head with a hammer; and if it hurts, blame your head for not being more resistant to shock. The blow with the hammer could not possibly be to blame — now could it? Just ask your doctor.[4]This obvious absurdity that comes with trying to conceal that vaccines cause death is likewise noted by William White:
It is usual at coroners' inquests on vaccination fatalities to produce children vaccinated at the same time from the same vaccinifer, and to assert that inasmuch as they have made good recoveries, it is impossible that the virus was at fault, and that something else than vaccination must have been the cause of death. The argument often impresses a jury, but it is grossly fallacious. Suppose a mad dog bit six men, and that five escaped injury beyond their wounds and fright, and that one died of rabies, would the escape of the five prove that the death of the sixth was unconnected with the dog? Or suppose an equal potion of gin were administered to six infants, one of whom died and five recovered, would the recovery of the five prove that gin did not kill the sixth? Mr. Stoker writes to the newspapers that he vaccinated twelve other persons with the virus he used for Miss Ellen Terry, and that as no untoward symptoms appeared in the twelve, therefore Miss Terry's whitlow had no connection with her vaccination — and this in spite of the untoward symptoms falling due at the very time that vaccination accounted for them! Any reasons are good for those disposed to be convinced, and who have settled it in their minds that vaccination is invariably harmless.[5]Note White's final comments: "Any reasons are good for those disposed to be convinced, and who have settled it in their minds that vaccination is invariably harmless." White recognizes what is common to human nature — confirmation bias. We too often make up our mind about something from the outset, so that facts will be distorted to conform to our biases — instead of truth and reality.
Notes
_______________________________________________
[1] Eleanora I. McBean, Swine Flu Expose (1977). Retrieved April 12, 2018, from http://www.whale.to/vaccine/sf5.html#A DOCTOR%E2%80%99S.
[2] William White, The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-fact Chapters (London: E.W. Allen, 1885), xl, xli.[3] Appendix IX to the Final Report of the Royal Commission on Vaccination (London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1897), 364.
[4] McBean, Swine Flu Expose. Retrieved May 9, 2018, from http://www.whale.to/vaccine/sf5.html#A DOCTOR%E2%80%99S.
[5] White, The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-fact Chapters, xli, xlii.
Not wanting to acknowledge the truth
Vaccination Tracts, published in 1892, quotes from an article titled "Certificates of Death" by Henry May, Health Officer to the Aston Union. In this article, May discusses a tendency for medical men to conceal deaths caused by vaccination (specifically, vaccine-induced erysipelas) — and even confesses to doing so himself in order to "preserve vaccination from reproach":
An article on “Certificates of Death,” by Mr. Henry May, Health Officer to the Aston Union, Birmingham, says: “In certificates given by us voluntarily, and to which the public have access, it is scarcely to be expected that a medical man will give opinions which may tell against or reflect upon himself in any way, or which are likely to cause annoyance or injury to the survivors. In such cases he will most likely tell the' truth, but not the whole truth, and assign some prominent symptom of the disease as the cause of death. As instances of cases which may tell against the medical man himself, I will mention erysipelas from vaccination, and puerperal fever. A death from the first cause occurred not long ago in my practice, and although I had not vaccinated the child, yet in my desire to preserve vaccination from reproach I omitted all mention of it from my certificate of death." [1]Truth is inconvenient to the pro-vaccine paradigm; and so, William White writes:
Indeed, it is a commonplace with medical men, that no child dies of Vaccination; and hence Vaccination is not an admitted cause of death; and when the fact is insisted upon, there is no limit to the hardihood wherewith the truth is crushed down and covered up. Coroners refuse to hold inquests on children slain by Vaccination ... [2]In not wanting to acknowledge the truth that vaccines are a killer, the pro-vaccine medical system has embraced lies. As Alfred R. Wallace once wrote:
I have also been struck by the (apparent) want of honesty in the defenders of vaccination, in repeating over and over again statements which are not true, and in actually falsifying the records of small-pox mortality by entering all doubtful cases as "unvaccinated."[3]
Notes_______________________________________________
[1] Cited in Vaccination Tracts: Historical and Critical Summary in Three Parts: Part 1. The Imposture of the current Smallpox Lymph called Vaccine, and the new Imposture of Calf-Lymph; Also, the Chaos of Statute Law dealing with Vaccine Substance, "Notes" (Providence: Snow & Farnham, 1892), 31.
[2] William White, The Story of a Great Delusion in a Series of Matter-of-fact Chapters (London: E.W. Allen, 1885), 68.
[3] Alfred R. Wallace, in a letter to a one Mr. Tebb (Sept. 16, 1883). In The Vaccination Inquirer and Health Review, Volume the Fifth, April, 1883, to March, 1884 (London: Edward W. Allen, 1884), 160.
The unreliability of death certificates today
In a 2011 piece, PBS discusses the unreliability of modern death certificates:
Beyond standard details such as age, race, gender, education, time and place of death, the most valuable documentation is cause and manner of death. It's also the most prone to error.
Health professionals commonly complain that if they see "cardiac arrest" written as the cause of death, it's often a catchall, meaning the physician couldn't determine the cause of death.
The CDC publishes a physician's handbook to help navigate the form.
In Part I, the certifier must describe the immediate cause of death —The "often confusion and ambiguity" that comes with pronouncing official causes of death opens the door to all kinds of evils — including suppressing vaccines as a cause of death. The problem compounds as it relates to autopsies contradicting the official cause of death, since amending death certificates is a difficult process. PBS continues:
the conditions and sequence of events that led up to the death. In Part II, they must also list the underlying causes of death over time. This can be something that happened in the hours before a person died, or be a condition revealed in the medical history from several years ago. And because there's often confusion and ambiguity, certifiers can use words like "probable" or "presumed" to qualify their decisions but they must always fill out the underlying causes.[1]
Other errors arise when an autopsy reveals that the original diagnosis on a death certificate was incorrect. This often happens when an autopsy has been requested because families, the courts, insurance companies or other interested parties are in dispute over how someone died. But getting that information amended on the death certificate, which is required by law, and reported back to the mortality division at the CDC can take months, sometimes years, and in some cases is never recorded as a matter of record.[2]One can see, then, that the system makes it difficult to challenge initial pronouncements on death certificates — including when they do not acknowledge vaccines as a cause of death.
Interestingly, "medical errors" have been widely unacknowledged in death certificates — despite being one of the leading causes of death! As Vanessa McMains notes in the 2016 piece Johns Hopkins study suggests medical errors are third-leading cause of death in U.S.,
Analyzing medical death rate data over an eight-year period, Johns Hopkins patient safety experts have calculated that more than 250,000 deaths per year are due to medical error in the U.S. Their figure, published May 3 in The BMJ, surpasses the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's third leading cause of death—respiratory disease, which kills close to 150,000 people per year.
The Johns Hopkins team says the CDC's way of collecting national health statistics fails to classify medical errors separately on the death certificate. The researchers are advocating for updated criteria for classifying deaths on death certificates.[3]Sadly, while death certificates have been known to protect doctors from the taint of "medical errors," they put patients in harm's way via vaccines by concealing their dangers (as we go on to discuss).
Notes
_______________________________________________
[1] Frontline Post Mortem, "Documenting Death — The Certificate" (Feburary 1, 2011, PBS). Retrieved December 15, 2018, from https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/post-mortem/things-to-know/death-certificates.html.
[2] Ibid.[3] Vanessa McMains, Johns Hopkins study suggests medical errors are third-leading cause of death in U.S., HUB (May 3, 2016). Retrieved May 30, 2018, from https://hub.jhu.edu/2016/05/03/medical-errors-third-leading-cause-of-death/
On vaccines today being omitted as official cause of death
On the suppression of vaccines as an official cause of death to infants, Neil Z. Miller published the following in 2014:
There are 130 official ways for an infant to die. These official categories of death, sanctioned by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO), are published in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). When a baby dies, coroners must choose from among these 130 categories.
The official causes of death listed in the ICD include nearly every imaginable — and tragic — possibility. However, there is NO category for infant deaths caused by vaccines. This is odd because the federal government is aware that vaccines permanently disable and kill some babies — the very reason Congress established a "death and disability" tax on childhood vaccines more than 25 years ago when the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (Public Law 99-660) created the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP).[1]Miller also writes,
ICD-6, issued in 1948, and ICD-7, issued in 1955, included "Prophylactic inoculation and vaccination" as a separate cause of death category with subcategories (codes Y40-Y49) for death due to "vaccination against smallpox" (code Y40), "inoculation against whooping cough" (code Y42), "inoculation against other infectious disease" (code Y49), etc. The ICD-8, issued in 1965, deleted the subcategories for death due to inoculation against individual diseases while maintaining "Prophylactic inoculation and vaccination" (code Y42) as a separate cause of death category. When the ICD-9 was issued in 1979, authorities removed all cause of death classifications associated with vaccination.[2]
Notes
_______________________________________________
[2] Ibid., footnote 4
Observations of a death certificate clerk
Joy Fritz, a Death Certificate Clerk, provides via her own experience and research an analysis of how the system officially hides vaccine-caused fatalities. Joy writes,
I work with doctors, coroners and the local county registrars every day to create death records. It's what I do for a living and I wanted to share my thoughts on the mortality rates being thrown around on mainstream and social media regarding the influenza epidemic. Please note: This information I am sharing is not limited to influenza reporting, but rather, serves as a case study of how the mortality rate recording system (mal)functions at large.[1]Fritz discusses learning about the system being stacked to preserve vaccines from reproach:
I started researching mortality rates to find the line item in the CDC reports for “deaths due to influenza” vs. “adverse reaction to influenza medications and immunizations”. I found influenza rates, no problem. Flu medications and shots? No deaths reported. Awesome. What a simple decision to make! But, being in the mortuary industry and curious how they get these reports, I looked at the last full report for 2014 and dug deeper and found that they simply code and reorganize the data that they receive from death records — the very death records that I am typing up and registering everyday.
So my head started exploding. And I felt, and still feel, sick. I have realized that without knowing it, I knew exactly how influenza deaths are recorded, and I know exactly why there is no line item in the CDC’s mortality rates for adverse reactions to common medical treatments.[2]There is, says Joy, an "incredibly rare reality that medication complications and adverse reactions do get captured (usually in box 112 of the death record, not as the primary underlying cause)."[3] However, the system opposes the certification of "unnatural" causes of death:
What most people don't know is that doctors are not allowed to attest to anything that is not a strictly NATURAL cause of death. Falls, medication complications or overdoses, causes with the word ‘injury’ in it, anything that is considered an unnatural or external cause is outside the realm of their jurisdiction as far as the death record is concerned. The Coroner would need to be contacted and agree to certify or co-certify a death record that has an unnatural or external cause listed. This is a whole other, very complicated reporting issue that I will not get into in this post. I will say, however, from the perspective of a mortuary representative, that everyone involved (doctor, coroner, registrar and myself) understands that the delay caused by any coroner involvement is highly dreaded and avoided if at all possible due to the amplified grief it can cause the family if they do not want an autopsy or investigation done or have to suffer a delay in services and or an upset in their own personal closure process.[4]Also, legality and personal liability is a disincentive for certifying a medical procedure as a cause of death:
In this medication example, as you can imagine, even IF they realize that the medication was prescribed erroneously, it would not be in the professional best interest of the medical provider or medical facility to report this prescription error and its possibly fatal complications to the family or public health officials. I have many friends and family in the medical industry and it is easily admitted that legal and personal liability is a factor in the considerations of proper reporting. However, if and when this possibly fatal prescription misstep was ever reported, it would be in some very passive EMR analysis many months or years later, with no urgency or real-time public health warning. The ability for government to cross-check and minutely examine nearly 3 million decedent medical records of varying electronic availability — annually — it’s just not there.[5]
Notes
_______________________________________________
[1] Joy Fritz, A Humbling Exposé into the Creation of Mortality Rates and its Impact on Our Public Health Beliefs and Choices (Facebook, March 11). Retrieved May 23, 2018, from https://bit.ly/2s18lYX
[4] Ibid.
[2] Ibid.
[3] Ibid. [5] Ibid.
Observations of an ER Nurse
The article ER Nurse Shares His Experiences With Vaccine Reactions is written by a professing ER Nurse with the pseudonym GuerillaRN. He draws on his vast experience to describe the countless vaccine reactions he has seen — along with the concomitant dismissal by doctors of the role of vaccines in said reactions.[1]
His article emphasizes the failure of doctors to report vaccine reactions to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) (even though they are required). Naturally, the failure of doctors to connect vaccines with the reactions they cause would also affect how certifications of death will be reported.
GuerillaRN writes,
I cannot even begin to guess how many times over the years I have seen vaccine reactions come through my E.R. Without any exaggeration, it has to be counted in hundreds. ...
Too often I heard a parent say something akin to "Yes they are current, the pediatrician caught up their vaccines this morning during their check up, and the pediatrician said they were in perfect health!" ...
For all the cases I've seen, I have NEVER seen any medical provider report them to VAERS. I have filed VAERS reports. But I am the ONLY nurse I have EVER met that files VAERS reports.
I also have NEVER met a doctor that filed a VAERS report.
Mind you, I have served in multiple hospitals across multiple states, alongside probably well over a hundred doctors and probably 300-400+ nurses. ...
I reminded the doctor as they are writing their report that the child was vaccinated mere hours before. And at the end, there is total omission of this fact, and the physician pass-off notes state encephalitis of unknown origin.
I ask the doctor if they will file a VAERS report, and they argue that this has nothing to do with it, its purely coincidental, and nothing should be filed, they are safe and effective. ...
It's this giant rug-sweep that happens, and any mention of the vaccination is systematically removed or withheld from the record.
A perfect example of this was an ambulance crew that came in with a pass-off report that included the fact the child had been vaccinated only hours prior to onset of symptoms. The physician made sure this pass-off sheet disappeared mysteriously and could not get filed with the patient medical record.
So yes, I have seen the vaccine damage cover up first hand. I know that it is intentional and active in the medical community. I know that it is happening.
And on top of total denial of any association, and total cover up, they also refuse to report to VAERS which is supposed to be reported to for ANYTHING that is even in NO WAY SUSPECTED to be associated with the vaccine. This is a systemic suppression of information and statistics. ...
We lie. As a profession. (I don't.) But as a profession, we lie, we rug sweep the risks, and we sugar coat it. We do it every day with every interaction. That is the truth of it.
And if you have to be lucky enough to get one that isn't lying to you, they are probably simply ignorant of the truth and never read the insert or the PDR or the warnings on the manufacturers website.
That covers about 99.9% of everyone in healthcare. Well, allopathic health care anyway.[2]
Notes
_______________________________________________
[2] GuerillaRN, ER Nurse Shares His Experiences With Vaccine Reactions (Health Families for God, November 18, 2015), https://www.healthyfamiliesforgod.com/blog/2015/11/er-nurse-shares-experiences-vaccine-reactions
A few contemporary examples
As we have shown, in our own day — just as it has been throughout vaccine history — deaths by vaccines are being concealed via official causes of death. Here are a few contemporary examples.
George Fisher was 18 months when he was apparently killed, in 2008, by the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine. Of course, the Coroner — quite conveniently — dismissed the death as "natural causes":
A coroner ruled Friday that a common childhood vaccination was not responsible for a baby's death, but the boy's parents disagree, the Guardian reported Friday.
Eighteen-month-old George Fisher died after doctors vaccinated him with the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine while he was sick, the baby’s parents told the coroner at an inquest this week.
Although the parents blame the vaccination, Coroner Alan Crickmore believes the boy died from "natural causes," the newspaper reported.
George was suffering from a febrile convulsion, which occurs in young children when their body temperature rapidly increases, when his parents took him to Overton Park Surgery in Cheltenham, England, to get the shot.
The Fishers believe the vaccine is "implicated" in their son's January 2006 death and that doctors should have warned them that a child suffering from a high fever should not receive the shot.[1]Michael Belkin, in a testimony to Congress, said that his daughter Lyla Rose Belkin died after getting the Hepatitis B vaccine. The NY Medical Examiner ruled her death Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), conveniently neglecting to mention in the report the vaccine and Lyla's swollen brain — obviously caused by the vaccine:
My daughter Lyla Rose Belkin died on September 16, 1998 at the age of five weeks, about 15 hours after receiving her second Hepatitis B vaccine booster shot. Lyla was a lively, alert five-week-old baby when I last held her in my arms. Little did I imagine as she gazed intently into my eyes with all the innocence and wonder of a newborn child that she would die that night. She was never ill before receiving the Hepatitis B shot that afternoon. At her final feeding that night, she was extremely agitated, noisy and feisty — and then she fell asleep suddenly and stopped breathing. The autopsy ruled out choking, The NY Medical Examiner ruled her death Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS).
But the NY Medical Examiner (Dr. Persechino) neglected to mention Lyla’s swollen brain or the hepatitis B vaccine in the autopsy report. The coroner spoke to my wife and I and our pediatrician (Dr. Zullo) the day of the autopsy and clearly stated that her brain was swollen. The pediatrician Dr. Zullo’s notes of that conversation are “brain swollen … not sure cause yet … could not see how recombinant vaccine could cause problem.”
SIDS is a diagnosis of exclusion .. “it wasn’t this, it wasn’t that, everything has been ruled out and we don’t know what it was.” A swollen brain is not SIDS. Through conversations with other experienced pathologists, I subsequently discovered that brain inflammation is a classic adverse reaction to vaccination (with any vaccine) in the medical literature.[2]Two-month-old Reid Thomas Day-Englehart died not long after suffering a barrage of eight vaccine doses. Cause of death? You guessed it — "accidental":
Born completely healthy, two-month-old Reid Thomas Day-Englehart was vaccinated on May 20, 2015 with eight vaccine doses, including DTaP (three vaccines in one shot), Hib, polio, pneumococcal, hepatitis B and the oral rotavirus vaccine. ...
Nine days later, without a struggle and without any obstruction of his airways, baby Reid stopped breathing while asleep on his father’s chest. He passed away May 29, 2015. ...
An investigation was done and Reid’s death was ruled accidental. The immediate cause listed on his autopsy report and death certificate was due to “possible suffocation,” without any signs or proof he suffocated or airways were obstructed. ...
Christy recalls the day she brought Reid in for his 2-month shots. “It was May 20, 2015 and Reid’s father, Dusty, took him to get his vaccines. When they came home from the doctor, Reid was passed out and slept 11 hours straight, which was not normal,” she explains. “When he woke up, he was very cranky. He would not let you put him down and screamed often. He was drinking full bottles before the shots, but after he stopped eating normally — in fact, he never took a full bottle again. He never smiled or laughed again either.” ...
Within days, the police called Dusty, Reid’s father, and told him they would rule it “possible suffocation” due to co-sleeping. “I know that wasn’t the cause. I know Reid would’ve fought to breath. Dusty would’ve felt him struggle or kick — Reid was very strong already and could hold his head up for many weeks already,” explains Christy. “I have since found out that the doctors and coroners will do anything they can to NOT blame the vaccines.”[3]Finally, there is the case of 5½ month-old Matthew Gage Downing-Powers, who died two days after being subjected to eight vaccinations. The usual denial of the complicity of vaccines — despite the obvious:
Matthew Gage Downing-Powers passed away on October 9, 2013. He was 5 ½ months old and died less than 2 days after receiving 8 vaccines. After Matthew’s lifeless body was taken to the hospital, his parents were kept from seeing him, to say their good-byes. A month and a half later, he was returned cremated. Then Matthew’s parents were denied a copy of his autopsy report. ...
After the shots, he didn’t have a fever or a low grade one. We didn’t give him Tylenol. He was just grumpy and crying some. We checked him every hour. His temperature stayed normal but he wasn’t his happy go lucky self. All my kids got grumpy after their shots. ...
I didn’t call the doctor on Tuesday. I knew these were typical behaviors after the kids received the vaccines. He is my 4th son. We had our other 3 vaccinated and knew what to expect.
I thought I would give it another day to see if he was still grumpy but we didn’t get to the next day. Matthew was gone by then. He was found lifeless. He went to bed that Tuesday night and my husband found him Wednesday morning. ...
I don’t think they cremated him before telling me but part of me feels they did, to cover up his death. I will never know but my instincts tell me something was being hidden. I think the funeral home did a nice job, they were very patient with me, they understood why I kept calling them so many times, to see if somebody there could tell me what happened to my son’s body. ...
The coroner was informed of the vaccines Matthew had just received. I had even asked the coroner if it was possible the vaccines killed my son. The coroner straight lied to my face, or more, over the phone, saying that no, it was not the vaccinations that killed him. ...
I did contact him after we had received his death certificate saying pending investigation still and I asked if they had finished with his autopsy report. They told me no. I called once more and they told me that they couldn’t give me anymore information and that I would have to call the coroner’s office here in Needles, California. I have done that and still no answer, no nothing.[4]
Notes
_______________________________________________
[2] The Refusers, "Michael Belkin Testimony to Congress on Hepatitis B Vaccine" (May 18,1999). Retrieved December 15, 2018, from
https://therefusers.com/michael-belkin-testimony-to-congress-on-hepatitis-b-vaccine/
[3] Learn the Risk, "8 Vaccine Doses Killed 2 Month Old Baby" (December 10, 2016). Retrieved June 20, 2018, from https://www.learntherisk.org/stories/8-vaccine-doses-killed-2-month-old-baby/[4] Augustina Ursino, "California Infant Dies after 8 Vaccines, Family Gets Him Back from Hospital Cremated" (Vactruth.com, February 26, 2015, updated April 26, 2016). Retrieved June 20, 2018, from https://vactruth.com/2015/02/26/infant-dies-after-8-vaccines/
Conclusion
Why do so many give vaccines such preferential treatment? Idols are considered sacred, and their followers will go to great lengths to protect them from reproach. And such followers will likewise go to great lengths to manipulate and deceive others to protect them from reproach. Thus we have everyone from vaccine worshippers and the sincerely misguided working to protect the "good name" of vaccines.
Scripture speaks to those who deliberately conceal the vaccine holocaust to protect the vaccine idol:
But you forgers of lies,You are all worthless physicians. (Job 13:4, NKJV)
For He knows deceitful men;He sees wickedness also.Will He not then consider it? (Job 11:11, NKJV)
1 comment:
Thank you for getting the truth out there. Jesus our King created us and the world we live in. To think that we can do better than Jesus with vaccines, pesticides, GMOs is sadly wrong.
Post a Comment